According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x7fe8 realized a $457K profit across two HYPE short trades. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 24, 2025. @lookonchain reports the same address then bought 207,389 HYPE in spot, totaling about $6.9M. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 24, 2025; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7fe8cfe481ec2f702692a9152e3f002f3e417ac6. @lookonchain adds that the whale has placed additional limit buy orders for 127,337.88 HYPE, roughly $3.75M, within the $28.04–$31.475 price range. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 24, 2025; legacy.hyperdash.com/trader/0x7fe8cfe481ec2f702692a9152e3f002f3e417ac6.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xC79...12bE7 sold 175 WBTC at an average price of $92,444.59 over the past 3 hours, totaling approximately $16.177 million notional, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and wallet link explorer.cow.fi/address/0xC79b6416bD17446f930d32A7B78CF60D35A12bE7. The tranche was acquired on-chain during Aug–Oct 2024 at an average entry of $74,746.46, yielding a realized profit of about $3.097 million and a realized ROI near 23.7% on the sold amount, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. The address still holds 491.84 WBTC on-chain, making the reported sale roughly 26% of the combined 666.84 WBTC sold plus remaining, based on the cited figures, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. The source also notes the position’s peak profit had retraced by more than $5.9 million before this sale, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. At the reported average sell price, the remaining 491.84 WBTC would be worth approximately $45.5 million, calculated from the source’s price and holdings data, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, SharpLink Gaming (SBET) moved 5,533 ETH (~$16.48M) to Galaxy Digital about 3 hours ago, with the transaction address link provided by the author (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The same wallet sent 5,442 ETH (~$17.02M) to Galaxy Digital the previous day, bringing two-day transfers to 10,975 ETH (~$33.50M) according to @OnchainDataNerd.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x6834 that has been long $ASTER for 38 days deposited 1M USDC two hours prior to increase its $ASTER long, source: @lookonchain. The address now holds 2.3M ASTER valued at $2.86M, source: @lookonchain. The update was posted on Nov 17, 2025, indicating the deposit occurred roughly two hours before that time, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, a whale that previously borrowed 66,000 ETH to sell has purchased 75,418 ETH worth $269.46M in the past 12 hours and now holds 266,901 ETH valued at $949M, source: @lookonchain. The 12-hour purchases equal roughly 28% of the whale’s current stack and exceed the prior 66,000 ETH borrow by about 9,418 ETH (1.14x), derived from the reported figures, source: @lookonchain. The implied average buy price for the last 12 hours is about $3,573 per ETH, and the current holdings imply about $3,556 per ETH, calculated from the reported USD amounts, source: @lookonchain. The accumulation pace over the period was approximately 6,285 ETH per hour, or about $22.5M per hour, calculated from the reported data, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x5AEB deposited 14M USDC to Hyperliquid and has purchased 210,701 HYPE worth $8.34M so far; source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1986675480574239169. The address activity and transfers can be reviewed on Hypurrscan at https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc; source: https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc. Based on those figures, approximately $5.66M USDC remains unspent relative to the reported HYPE purchases (14M minus $8.34M); source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1986675480574239169. Traders can monitor this address and HYPE order flow on Hyperliquid for any subsequent transactions; source: https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $14,000,000 USDC into HyperLiquid and began buying HYPE on the spot market on Nov 7, 2025. On-chain records at hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc confirm the USDC inflow and subsequent HYPE spot purchase transactions on HyperLiquid. Per Hypurrscan, these transactions reflect executed buy-side activity in HYPE spot tied to the referenced address.

According to @Excellion, large Bitfinex accounts are actively buying from short-term sellers, signaling whale accumulation on the exchange and a notable order-flow cue for crypto traders. Source: @Excellion on X, Nov 4, 2025. The post included an image and was amplified via a retweet by @Andre_Dragosch, drawing attention to increased whale buy activity on Bitfinex among market participants tracking exchange flows. Source: @Excellion and @Andre_Dragosch on X, Nov 4, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens citing @nansen_ai data, a newly created wallet withdrew $5.3M USDT from Aster DEX and spent $3.2M USDT to purchase 2.94M ASTER at an average price of $1.09 over the past 15 hours. According to @OnchainLens and @nansen_ai, the wallet address 0xe307f534eec7256331c347ad73e7a08446f1d7a7 still holds $2M USDT, leaving roughly 38 percent of the initial $5.3M balance unspent. According to @OnchainLens based on @nansen_ai on-chain records, the ASTER position’s on-chain cost basis is $1.09, providing a concrete reference for tracking subsequent flows from this address.

According to the source, a claim was posted that a new wallet received 24.4K ETH worth about $93M, pending independent on-chain confirmation, source: original X post. Traders should verify the transaction hash, recipient address, and whether the wallet is exchange-labeled via Etherscan and Arkham before taking positions, source: Etherscan; Arkham Intelligence. If the address is not exchange-labeled and funds are newly accumulated, circulating supply on exchanges may be reduced, which can tighten spot liquidity; if it is an internal exchange transfer, market impact is typically neutral, source: Etherscan labels; Nansen exchange flow analytics. Monitor ETH order books, funding, and basis to detect any demand shift after verification, source: Binance market data; Deribit futures and options metrics.

According to @52kskew, morning FOMO longs were sold into as a large firm offloaded exposure across multiple books, primarily on Coinbase and Binance, indicating profit-taking and overall delta reduction; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494. According to @52kskew, this flow reflects supply hitting the market and underscores the need for swift buyer participation during pullbacks to stabilize price action; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494. According to @52kskew, the critical near-term signal is whether buyers step in quickly on dips after the large firm’s exposure reduction; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494.

According to @EmberCN, an on-chain whale or institution purchased 8,637 ETH using 38.017 million DAI across three wallets within the past hour at an average price of 4,402 USD per ETH (source: @EmberCN post on X dated Oct 2, 2025). The three purchasing addresses were shared and can be monitored on Arkham Intel to verify transactions and subsequent flows (source: Arkham Intel address pages linked by @EmberCN). The post notes Bitget sponsorship, and traders can track these wallets on Arkham Intel for follow‑on transfers to inform short‑term ETH liquidity and order‑flow analysis (source: @EmberCN post and Arkham Intel address pages).

According to @lookonchain, a single whale deposited 31.52M USDC to Hyperliquid roughly 10 hours before the post to purchase XPL. According to @lookonchain, the whale has accumulated 29.27M XPL with an executed value of $31.13M on Hyperliquid. According to @lookonchain, these figures indicate an estimated average execution price of about $1.063 per XPL based on $31.13M spent for 29.27M XPL. Source: @lookonchain on X: x.com/lookonchain/status/1973207200643555794

According to @EmberCN, a single address moved 30 million USDC into Hyperliquid and swapped it entirely for 22.37 million XPL at an average price of $1.34, with XPL rising from $1.17 to $1.52 (+30%) during the buying, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485; https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971759358666317947; https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xd80DA302010A415586d92532a00A9544CFde70be. The same entity reportedly withdrew an additional 41.52 million USDC from Kraken, drawing attention to potential further on-chain transfers to Hyperliquid, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485; https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971759358666317947. For traders, the reported average cost basis is $1.34 versus a spot print of $1.52 at the time of reporting, implying roughly $4.0 million in unrealized PnL on 22.37 million XPL based on the cited fills and prices, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485. The post also disclosed sponsorship by Bitget, indicating the update is a sponsored market observation, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485.

According to @lookonchain, three whale addresses accumulated a combined 18.9M XPL on Hyperliquid, with activity verified by Hypurrscan address pages. Source: x.com/lookonchain/status/1971408421686816975; hypurrscan.io Address 0x8393 sold 249,999 HYPE for $10.5M and bought 7.92M XPL, as shown in the on-chain records. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io/address/0x8393e538f373c986be7e45e1647db6528ac52665 Address 0xcc07 deposited 6.27M USDC to Hyperliquid and purchased 5.28M XPL at $1.19, implying roughly $6.28M in notional executed. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io/address/0xcc07FBD0AA69923d45CaA1aAE2f8b42FeF6Dd368 Address 0xF555 deposited 6M USDC to Hyperliquid and bought 5.7M XPL at $1.05, implying about $5.99M in notional. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io/address/0xF555A2643164E518bA4c1F4A5b8ad63c0D6a858D These executed fills establish visible buyer cost levels at $1.05 and $1.19 for at least 10.98M XPL, providing concrete reference prices for order flow tracking. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io

According to Lookonchain, whale address 0x3c9E sold 1,000 ETH worth about $4.19 million roughly one hour before its Sep 22, 2025 post. According to Lookonchain, on-chain history over the past two months shows this address repeatedly buying ETH near higher prices and selling at lower levels.

According to @52kskew, price action around the $116.9K level showed reverse-direction tactics aimed at filling shorts while offloading inventory accumulated at earlier lows, indicating active order-flow control by a single entity, source: x.com/52kskew/status/1968056367664730457. @52kskew adds that this control could persist until a competing participant challenges it, which would likely create toxic flow and unfavorable conditions for intraday traders who risk getting farmed, source: x.com/52kskew/status/1968056367664730457.

According to @52kskew, BTC price is being walked down into the new week and longs are being used as liquidity for fills; source: @52kskew. He highlights notable bid depth and resting liquidity just below 115,000 USD, flagging a key order-book support pocket; source: @52kskew. Traders can monitor for liquidity-driven moves or sweeps into the sub-115K bids as price interacts with that area; source: @52kskew.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a wallet cluster labeled as Galaxy Digital accumulated 361,000 SOL (about $88.04 million) within roughly 5 hours, indicating sizable on-chain inflows to that entity (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The address and entity attribution can be verified via Arkham Intelligence’s Galaxy Digital page shared by the author at https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/galaxy-digital, enabling traders to monitor further inflows or outflows in real time (source: Arkham Intelligence).

According to @Pentosh1 (source: x.com/Pentosh1/status/1966348622590607821), SOL has been bought heavily at market so far. According to @Pentosh1 (source: x.com/Pentosh1/status/1966348622590607821), a good amount of SOL will be locked. According to @Pentosh1 (source: x.com/Pentosh1/status/1966348622590607821), this combination is described as another layup setup for traders.