According to the source, a claim was posted that a new wallet received 24.4K ETH worth about $93M, pending independent on-chain confirmation, source: original X post. Traders should verify the transaction hash, recipient address, and whether the wallet is exchange-labeled via Etherscan and Arkham before taking positions, source: Etherscan; Arkham Intelligence. If the address is not exchange-labeled and funds are newly accumulated, circulating supply on exchanges may be reduced, which can tighten spot liquidity; if it is an internal exchange transfer, market impact is typically neutral, source: Etherscan labels; Nansen exchange flow analytics. Monitor ETH order books, funding, and basis to detect any demand shift after verification, source: Binance market data; Deribit futures and options metrics.

According to @52kskew, morning FOMO longs were sold into as a large firm offloaded exposure across multiple books, primarily on Coinbase and Binance, indicating profit-taking and overall delta reduction; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494. According to @52kskew, this flow reflects supply hitting the market and underscores the need for swift buyer participation during pullbacks to stabilize price action; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494. According to @52kskew, the critical near-term signal is whether buyers step in quickly on dips after the large firm’s exposure reduction; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494.

According to @EmberCN, an on-chain whale or institution purchased 8,637 ETH using 38.017 million DAI across three wallets within the past hour at an average price of 4,402 USD per ETH (source: @EmberCN post on X dated Oct 2, 2025). The three purchasing addresses were shared and can be monitored on Arkham Intel to verify transactions and subsequent flows (source: Arkham Intel address pages linked by @EmberCN). The post notes Bitget sponsorship, and traders can track these wallets on Arkham Intel for follow‑on transfers to inform short‑term ETH liquidity and order‑flow analysis (source: @EmberCN post and Arkham Intel address pages).

According to @lookonchain, a single whale deposited 31.52M USDC to Hyperliquid roughly 10 hours before the post to purchase XPL. According to @lookonchain, the whale has accumulated 29.27M XPL with an executed value of $31.13M on Hyperliquid. According to @lookonchain, these figures indicate an estimated average execution price of about $1.063 per XPL based on $31.13M spent for 29.27M XPL. Source: @lookonchain on X: x.com/lookonchain/status/1973207200643555794

According to @EmberCN, a single address moved 30 million USDC into Hyperliquid and swapped it entirely for 22.37 million XPL at an average price of $1.34, with XPL rising from $1.17 to $1.52 (+30%) during the buying, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485; https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971759358666317947; https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xd80DA302010A415586d92532a00A9544CFde70be. The same entity reportedly withdrew an additional 41.52 million USDC from Kraken, drawing attention to potential further on-chain transfers to Hyperliquid, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485; https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971759358666317947. For traders, the reported average cost basis is $1.34 versus a spot print of $1.52 at the time of reporting, implying roughly $4.0 million in unrealized PnL on 22.37 million XPL based on the cited fills and prices, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485. The post also disclosed sponsorship by Bitget, indicating the update is a sponsored market observation, source: https://x.com/EmberCN/status/1971830503738331485.

According to @lookonchain, three whale addresses accumulated a combined 18.9M XPL on Hyperliquid, with activity verified by Hypurrscan address pages. Source: x.com/lookonchain/status/1971408421686816975; hypurrscan.io Address 0x8393 sold 249,999 HYPE for $10.5M and bought 7.92M XPL, as shown in the on-chain records. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io/address/0x8393e538f373c986be7e45e1647db6528ac52665 Address 0xcc07 deposited 6.27M USDC to Hyperliquid and purchased 5.28M XPL at $1.19, implying roughly $6.28M in notional executed. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io/address/0xcc07FBD0AA69923d45CaA1aAE2f8b42FeF6Dd368 Address 0xF555 deposited 6M USDC to Hyperliquid and bought 5.7M XPL at $1.05, implying about $5.99M in notional. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io/address/0xF555A2643164E518bA4c1F4A5b8ad63c0D6a858D These executed fills establish visible buyer cost levels at $1.05 and $1.19 for at least 10.98M XPL, providing concrete reference prices for order flow tracking. Source: @lookonchain; hypurrscan.io

According to Lookonchain, whale address 0x3c9E sold 1,000 ETH worth about $4.19 million roughly one hour before its Sep 22, 2025 post. According to Lookonchain, on-chain history over the past two months shows this address repeatedly buying ETH near higher prices and selling at lower levels.

According to @52kskew, price action around the $116.9K level showed reverse-direction tactics aimed at filling shorts while offloading inventory accumulated at earlier lows, indicating active order-flow control by a single entity, source: x.com/52kskew/status/1968056367664730457. @52kskew adds that this control could persist until a competing participant challenges it, which would likely create toxic flow and unfavorable conditions for intraday traders who risk getting farmed, source: x.com/52kskew/status/1968056367664730457.

According to @52kskew, BTC price is being walked down into the new week and longs are being used as liquidity for fills; source: @52kskew. He highlights notable bid depth and resting liquidity just below 115,000 USD, flagging a key order-book support pocket; source: @52kskew. Traders can monitor for liquidity-driven moves or sweeps into the sub-115K bids as price interacts with that area; source: @52kskew.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a wallet cluster labeled as Galaxy Digital accumulated 361,000 SOL (about $88.04 million) within roughly 5 hours, indicating sizable on-chain inflows to that entity (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The address and entity attribution can be verified via Arkham Intelligence’s Galaxy Digital page shared by the author at https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/galaxy-digital, enabling traders to monitor further inflows or outflows in real time (source: Arkham Intelligence).

According to @Pentosh1 (source: x.com/Pentosh1/status/1966348622590607821), SOL has been bought heavily at market so far. According to @Pentosh1 (source: x.com/Pentosh1/status/1966348622590607821), a good amount of SOL will be locked. According to @Pentosh1 (source: x.com/Pentosh1/status/1966348622590607821), this combination is described as another layup setup for traders.

According to @52kskew, a prior short has flipped into a $115 million long positioned at $115.4K, indicating a major repositioning at that level, source: @52kskew on X, Sep 12, 2025. According to @52kskew, the post also flags $115.4K as an important price point for BTC that traders are watching, source: @52kskew on X, Sep 12, 2025.

According to @rovercrc, BlackRock sold 35,009.18 ETH valued at $152.7 million in a post on X dated September 4, 2025 (source: @rovercrc on X). Based on figures cited in the source, this implies an average sale price of roughly $4,363 per ETH (source: @rovercrc on X, author-provided amounts). The source post does not include a transaction hash, wallet addresses, execution venue, or supporting filings, so the claim is not independently verifiable from the post itself (source: @rovercrc on X). Given the absence of on-chain or venue details in the source, any immediate liquidity or price impact on ETH is indeterminate from the provided information (source: @rovercrc on X).

According to @Pentosh1, a steady 1% per week pressure indicates sellers are on the wrong side and facing adverse carry, signaling ongoing headwinds for shorts until conditions shift, source: @Pentosh1 on X, Sep 2, 2025. He adds this dynamic persists unless the flow changes or the asset’s price rises enough that the 1% weekly effect becomes negligible over time, source: @Pentosh1 on X, Sep 2, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, Ethereum whale address 0xB04...D6ECB sold 4,000 ETH worth 17.8 million USD this morning after accumulating 10,807 ETH since August at an average entry price of 4,333 USD; the sale realized a profit of 476,000 USD and the wallet still holds 7,732 ETH. Source: Ai 姨 @ai_9684xtpa on X posted Aug 28, 2025 https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1960876806573318617 and the wallet link shared by the author https://t.co/qaEcOowqSB.

According to @rovercrc, an OG Bitcoin whale moved 300 BTC (about $34.9M) to Hyperliquid to buy more ETH, source: @rovercrc on X (Aug 23, 2025). According to @rovercrc, the whale holds a 135,265 ETH long position valued at approximately $581M, source: @rovercrc on X. According to @rovercrc, the whale also holds 122,226 ETH in spot worth about $535M, source: @rovercrc on X. According to @rovercrc, total unrealized profit across these ETH positions exceeds $100M, source: @rovercrc on X.

According to @52kskew, there is still a lot of chasing under price in EUR, BTC, and gold, source: @52kskew on X, Aug 22, 2025. According to @52kskew, short interest in BTC is increasing, source: @52kskew on X, Aug 22, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, a whale/institution that held 10,606 BTC for 7 years with $1.12B in profits has begun rotating from BTC to ETH, selling 3,100 BTC worth $348M so far, source: @EmberCN, X, Aug 22, 2025. According to @EmberCN, the entity bought 50,522 ETH spot worth $213M and opened a 135,000 ETH long using $120M margin for $571M notional, implying roughly 5x leverage, source: @EmberCN, X, Aug 22, 2025. According to @EmberCN, based on these figures the wallet now holds approximately $784M gross long ETH exposure (spot plus derivatives) against $348M BTC net selling to date, indicating an ETH-over-BTC positioning tilt by this participant, source: @EmberCN, X, Aug 22, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens, five wallets likely controlled by the same entity spent 4,806 ETH (about $21.23M) to acquire 938,489 LINK at an average price of $22.62 per token, with transaction details visible on Arkham Intelligence’s explorer. Source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence. The figures imply an ETH reference price near $4,417 from $21.23M divided by 4,806 ETH and establish a whale cost basis around $22.62 for LINK. Source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence. Traders can track the listed Arkham addresses for subsequent inflows or distribution and use the $22.62 average as a near-term reference level for positioning and risk management. Source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @lookonchain on X (Aug 15, 2025), the address labeled hacker "0x17E0" sold 4,958 ETH at $4,463 during a market dip, totaling about $22.13M and locking in a $9.75M profit (source: @lookonchain on X). @lookonchain also raised the prospect of this address buying back at higher prices as before, making the wallet a key watch for traders tracking potential re-entry flows (source: @lookonchain on X).