According to @OnchainLens, a 7-day-old wallet deposited 2 million USDC into Lighter to scale its LIT position after depositing a total of 4 million USDC over the past week, purchasing 1,285,010 LIT for 3.8 million dollars at an average execution price of 2.96, and still holding 193,717 USDC available, with the address shown at app.lighter.xyz/explorer/accounts/0x0b4a2c0757cDfDF88039baa6bE9A4677560105B1, source: Onchain Lens; Lighter Explorer. The executed size of 1,285,010 LIT at a 2.96 dollar average provides a clear on-chain cost basis to track this address’s unrealized PnL and potential liquidity footprint on Lighter, source: Onchain Lens; Lighter Explorer. Traders can monitor follow-on deposits, bids, or distribution from this wallet via the Lighter Explorer link and Lighter order flow for near-term market impact tracking in LIT, source: Lighter Explorer; Onchain Lens.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x46DB bought another 5,104 ETH (about $16.09M) around 30 minutes ago; source: Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. Since Dec 3, cumulative buys by this address reached 51,374 ETH (about $159.76M) at a $3,110 average price; source: Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. The address is 0x46DB0650645f7c9a29783c89171a62240CCc35cF as referenced via Arkham Intel; source: Arkham Intel via Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. Earlier today, the same tracker noted a 5,500 ETH purchase and a then-cumulative 41,767 ETH at a $3,130 average with an unrealized loss over $8.3M, which has since updated to the new totals; source: Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026. Based on the reported totals, the whale’s stated average entry shifted from $3,130 to $3,110 following additional buys, a change derived from Lookonchain’s data; source: calculation from Lookonchain on X, Jan 2, 2026.

According to @OnchainLens, a single wallet deposited $3 million USDC into HyperLiquid and executed $2.78 million of buys for 108,501 HYPE at an average price of $25.63, while also holding 10,030 HYPE in staking, based on the X post dated Dec 30, 2025 and the linked wallet view at app.coinmarketman.com/hypertracker/wallet/0x4A96036FB1529561fA3eeEB2781Fad2D4F25500e. For traders, the $25.63 cost basis is an immediate reference level for potential support or resistance in HYPE order flow on HyperLiquid, grounded in the reported fill price and wallet data source: @OnchainLens and app.coinmarketman.com/hypertracker/wallet/0x4A96036FB1529561fA3eeEB2781Fad2D4F25500e. The additional 10,030 HYPE in staking indicates part of the position is not immediately tradable, modestly tightening available float from this wallet during volatility, as evidenced by the same sources @OnchainLens and the referenced wallet page.

According to @EmberCN, after ETH fell below the whale’s prior $3,177 cost basis tied to a $120M ETH long, the whale’s unrealized gains were fully given back, and roughly 20 minutes before the post the whale added 20,000 ETH, bringing the long to 140,000 ETH (~$444M) with a $3,179 average entry (source: @EmberCN on X, Dec 11, 2025: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1999135253965967679). These figures quantify the whale’s current ETH long exposure and cost basis for traders tracking large flow (source: @EmberCN on X, Dec 11, 2025: https://twitter.com/EmberCN/status/1999135253965967679).

According to @MI_Algos, bid liquidity is moving higher in the ETH and BTC order book. source: @MI_Algos on X, Dec 10, 2025. According to @MI_Algos, dynamic moves like this tend to push price up. source: @MI_Algos on X, Dec 10, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xdfb0be32c83a32ee705e94fae9c3041bfefaf239 accumulated about $7.16 million worth of ENA over the past 10 hours, totaling 25.26 million ENA at an average purchase price of approximately $0.2845 (source: @ai_9684xtpa X post dated 2025-11-29; trade history dashboard: https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xdfb0be32c83a32ee705e94fae9c3041bfefaf239). Eight hours prior, 6.51 million USDC was deposited into Hyperliquid and then routed to the same wallet, with small residual limit orders still open at the time of reporting (source: @ai_9684xtpa; dashboard: https://hyperbot.network/trader/0xdfb0be32c83a32ee705e94fae9c3041bfefaf239).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, 5 hours ago the address labeled #gtrove_hl opened a TWAT position to accumulate 141k HYPE worth approximately $4.91M (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The source also shared the address, enabling traders to track subsequent on-chain transactions related to $HYPE in real time (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @lookonchain, Arthur Hayes (@CryptoHayes) bought 218,000 PENDLE for about USD 536,000 on Nov 26, 2025 based on on-chain tracking of the transaction, source: @lookonchain on X. The attribution of the buyer to Arthur Hayes is supported by the ARKM Intelligence entity page for Arthur Hayes that links the relevant addresses and activity, source: ARKM Intelligence. For traders, this whale accumulation event adds a timely data point for monitoring PENDLE order flow and liquidity in the near term, source: @lookonchain and ARKM Intelligence.

According to Onchain Lens, a previously dormant whale spent $3.25M DAI to buy 1,110 ETH at an average price of $2,933 after three months of inactivity, citing Nansen on-chain data. According to Onchain Lens, the same wallet earlier sold 15,575 ETH for $66.52M at a price of $4,270, based on Nansen data. According to Onchain Lens, the wallet still holds $67.8M DAI to buy more ETH, per Nansen data, marking $2,933 (recent accumulation) and $4,270 (prior distribution) as key reference levels for traders.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x7fe8 realized a $457K profit across two HYPE short trades. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 24, 2025. @lookonchain reports the same address then bought 207,389 HYPE in spot, totaling about $6.9M. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 24, 2025; hypurrscan.io/address/0x7fe8cfe481ec2f702692a9152e3f002f3e417ac6. @lookonchain adds that the whale has placed additional limit buy orders for 127,337.88 HYPE, roughly $3.75M, within the $28.04–$31.475 price range. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 24, 2025; legacy.hyperdash.com/trader/0x7fe8cfe481ec2f702692a9152e3f002f3e417ac6.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xC79...12bE7 sold 175 WBTC at an average price of $92,444.59 over the past 3 hours, totaling approximately $16.177 million notional, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and wallet link explorer.cow.fi/address/0xC79b6416bD17446f930d32A7B78CF60D35A12bE7. The tranche was acquired on-chain during Aug–Oct 2024 at an average entry of $74,746.46, yielding a realized profit of about $3.097 million and a realized ROI near 23.7% on the sold amount, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. The address still holds 491.84 WBTC on-chain, making the reported sale roughly 26% of the combined 666.84 WBTC sold plus remaining, based on the cited figures, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. The source also notes the position’s peak profit had retraced by more than $5.9 million before this sale, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X. At the reported average sell price, the remaining 491.84 WBTC would be worth approximately $45.5 million, calculated from the source’s price and holdings data, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, SharpLink Gaming (SBET) moved 5,533 ETH (~$16.48M) to Galaxy Digital about 3 hours ago, with the transaction address link provided by the author (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The same wallet sent 5,442 ETH (~$17.02M) to Galaxy Digital the previous day, bringing two-day transfers to 10,975 ETH (~$33.50M) according to @OnchainDataNerd.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x6834 that has been long $ASTER for 38 days deposited 1M USDC two hours prior to increase its $ASTER long, source: @lookonchain. The address now holds 2.3M ASTER valued at $2.86M, source: @lookonchain. The update was posted on Nov 17, 2025, indicating the deposit occurred roughly two hours before that time, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, a whale that previously borrowed 66,000 ETH to sell has purchased 75,418 ETH worth $269.46M in the past 12 hours and now holds 266,901 ETH valued at $949M, source: @lookonchain. The 12-hour purchases equal roughly 28% of the whale’s current stack and exceed the prior 66,000 ETH borrow by about 9,418 ETH (1.14x), derived from the reported figures, source: @lookonchain. The implied average buy price for the last 12 hours is about $3,573 per ETH, and the current holdings imply about $3,556 per ETH, calculated from the reported USD amounts, source: @lookonchain. The accumulation pace over the period was approximately 6,285 ETH per hour, or about $22.5M per hour, calculated from the reported data, source: @lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x5AEB deposited 14M USDC to Hyperliquid and has purchased 210,701 HYPE worth $8.34M so far; source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1986675480574239169. The address activity and transfers can be reviewed on Hypurrscan at https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc; source: https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc. Based on those figures, approximately $5.66M USDC remains unspent relative to the reported HYPE purchases (14M minus $8.34M); source: https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1986675480574239169. Traders can monitor this address and HYPE order flow on Hyperliquid for any subsequent transactions; source: https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $14,000,000 USDC into HyperLiquid and began buying HYPE on the spot market on Nov 7, 2025. On-chain records at hypurrscan.io/address/0x5AEB1821F596d2d9ffE182d3f914b274A80511cc confirm the USDC inflow and subsequent HYPE spot purchase transactions on HyperLiquid. Per Hypurrscan, these transactions reflect executed buy-side activity in HYPE spot tied to the referenced address.

According to @Excellion, large Bitfinex accounts are actively buying from short-term sellers, signaling whale accumulation on the exchange and a notable order-flow cue for crypto traders. Source: @Excellion on X, Nov 4, 2025. The post included an image and was amplified via a retweet by @Andre_Dragosch, drawing attention to increased whale buy activity on Bitfinex among market participants tracking exchange flows. Source: @Excellion and @Andre_Dragosch on X, Nov 4, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens citing @nansen_ai data, a newly created wallet withdrew $5.3M USDT from Aster DEX and spent $3.2M USDT to purchase 2.94M ASTER at an average price of $1.09 over the past 15 hours. According to @OnchainLens and @nansen_ai, the wallet address 0xe307f534eec7256331c347ad73e7a08446f1d7a7 still holds $2M USDT, leaving roughly 38 percent of the initial $5.3M balance unspent. According to @OnchainLens based on @nansen_ai on-chain records, the ASTER position’s on-chain cost basis is $1.09, providing a concrete reference for tracking subsequent flows from this address.

According to the source, a claim was posted that a new wallet received 24.4K ETH worth about $93M, pending independent on-chain confirmation, source: original X post. Traders should verify the transaction hash, recipient address, and whether the wallet is exchange-labeled via Etherscan and Arkham before taking positions, source: Etherscan; Arkham Intelligence. If the address is not exchange-labeled and funds are newly accumulated, circulating supply on exchanges may be reduced, which can tighten spot liquidity; if it is an internal exchange transfer, market impact is typically neutral, source: Etherscan labels; Nansen exchange flow analytics. Monitor ETH order books, funding, and basis to detect any demand shift after verification, source: Binance market data; Deribit futures and options metrics.

According to @52kskew, morning FOMO longs were sold into as a large firm offloaded exposure across multiple books, primarily on Coinbase and Binance, indicating profit-taking and overall delta reduction; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494. According to @52kskew, this flow reflects supply hitting the market and underscores the need for swift buyer participation during pullbacks to stabilize price action; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494. According to @52kskew, the critical near-term signal is whether buyers step in quickly on dips after the large firm’s exposure reduction; source: @52kskew on X x.com/52kskew/status/1974145027204055494.